Results 1–10 of 14 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "A new way to combat prejudice" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (9)HIV & AIDS (1)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1) 4 more... [+] Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (3)2012 (2)2011 (4)2010 (3) Results 1–10 of 14 Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)2.Gill v. Office of Personnel ManagementGay and lesbian parents are not any less fit or capable than heterosexual parents, and that their children are not less adjusted. The brief also addresses how denying federal recognition to legally married same-sex couples stigmatizes them.Amicus Brief (November 2011)3.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 4.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 5.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)6.Floyd v. CainResearch and psychological science indicate that not every voluntary confession is true. The brief also addresses why innocent people confess and how voluntary false confessions are difficult for judges, juries and others to discern.Amicus Brief (May 2010)7.Warney v. New York, CA 08 02261This case involves Douglas Warney, a man with mental retardation and AIDS-related dementia who was convicted of murder based solely on a false confession.Amicus Brief (July 2010)8.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013)9.Rivera v. Illinois, 2-09-1060APA described research on false confessions and factors that lead to them, such as length of interrogation, mental illness, and low IQ.Amicus Brief (July 2010)10.People v. ThomasAt issue in the appeal is whether the State of New York should allow expert testimony on the body of research addressing risk factors for false confessions.Amicus Brief (November 2013) Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 14 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "A new way to combat prejudice"