Results 1–8 of 8 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Psychologists’ memories of 9/11" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (4)Marriage & divorce (2)Learning & memory (1)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (1)Document TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (1)2012 (1)2011 (2)2010 (1) Results 1–8 of 8 Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 2.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 3.Commonwealth v. WalkerAPA filed an amicus brief urging the court to allow expert testimony on psychological research regarding eyewitness testimony, juror misunderstanding of the accuracy of eyewitness identification and the factors that can affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Amicus Brief (August 2011)4.Michigan v. KowalskiAPA’s brief supports scientific research on false confessions provides a strong empirical foundation for the admission of expert testimony on the subject and that it should be admitted as evidence under the Daubert standard for expert testimony.Amicus Brief (September 2011)5.Floyd v. CainResearch and psychological science indicate that not every voluntary confession is true. The brief also addresses why innocent people confess and how voluntary false confessions are difficult for judges, juries and others to discern.Amicus Brief (May 2010)6.APA Amicus BriefsLinks to amicus briefs submitted by APA on a variety of subjects, including sexual orientation, psychologist scope of practice, hospital privileges, and involuntary committal to mental hospitals.Amicus Brief 7.Griego v. Oliver Whether the New Mexico Constitution compels the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.Amicus Brief (September 2013)8.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012) Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–8 of 8 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Psychologists’ memories of 9/11"