Results 1–10 of 18 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Serving the underserved" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (13)Marriage & divorce (8)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (7)HIV & AIDS (1)Human rights (1) 1 more... [+] Women & men (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2014 (1)2013 (6)2012 (3)2011 (4)2010 (2) Results 1–10 of 18 Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Hollingsworth v. PerryAddresses a challenge to Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) that says “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”Amicus Brief (February 2013)2.Perry v. SchwarzeneggerChallenge to Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act).Amicus Brief (October 2010)3.Warney v. New York, CA 08 02261This case involves Douglas Warney, a man with mental retardation and AIDS-related dementia who was convicted of murder based solely on a false confession.Amicus Brief (July 2010)4.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)5.Sevcik v. Sandoval and Jackson v. Abercrombie This case challenges whether the Equal Protection Clause, part of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, does not prohibit the state from limiting marriage to people of the opposite sex. Amicus Brief (October 2013)6.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)7.Golinski v. Office of Personnel ManagementGay and lesbian parents are not any less fit or capable than heterosexual parents, and that their children are not less adjusted. The brief also addresses how denying federal recognition to legally married same-sex couples stigmatizes them.Amicus Brief (July 2012)8.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)9.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012)10.Griego v. Oliver Whether the New Mexico Constitution compels the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.Amicus Brief (September 2013) Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 18 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Serving the underserved"