Workshop Evaluation Tool #1

CE Program Title
Sponsoring organization
Date

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
1. The program objectives were met.
A. Objective #1 (Write out specific objective) 1 2 3 4 5
B. Objective #2 (Write out specific objective) 1 2 3 4 5
C. Objective #3 etc. (Write out specific objective) 1 2 3 4 5
2. Accuracy and utility of content were discussed. 1 2 3 4 5
3. Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training 1 2 3 4 5
4. Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training. 1 2 3 4 5
5. Teaching methods were effective. 1 2 3 4 5
6. Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content 1 2 3 4 5

 

 Instructor 1:

Name: _____________________________

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
7.  Knew the subject matter 1 2 3 4 5
8.  Taught the subject completely 1 2 3 4 5
9.  Elaborated upon the stated objectives 1 2 3 4 5
10. Presented content in an organized manner 1 2 3 4 5
11. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5
12. Answered questions effectively 1 2 3 4 5
13. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions 1 2 3 4 5

 

Instructor 2:

Name: ____________________________

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
8.  Knew the subject matter 1 2 3 4 5
9.  Taught the subject completely 1 2 3 4 5
10.  Elaborated upon the stated objectives 1 2 3 4 5
11. Presented content in an organized manner 1 2 3 4 5
12. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5
13. Answered questions effectively 1 2 3 4 5
14. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions 1 2 3 4 5

 

Professional & Ethical Issues
15. Presenter (or program chair, etc.) made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: 
a. Requirements for successful completion of activity Yes No
b. Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest) Yes No
c. Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interest Yes No
d. Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.) Yes No
e. Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks? Yes No

 

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
16. Facility was adequate for my needs 1 2 3 4 5
17. Special needs were met 1 2 3 4 5
18. Facility was comfortable and accessible 1 2 3 4 5
19. Food and beverage were adequate (if applicable) 1 2 3 4 5
20. Program brochure was informative and accurate 1 2 3 4 5

 

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
21. Information could be applied to my practice (if applicable)  1 2 3 4 5
22. Information could contribute to achieving personal or professional goals. 1 2 3 4 5
23. Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered. 1 2 3 4 5
24. How much did you learn in this course? Very Little Little Some A Good Bit A Great Deal
25. Did this program enhance your professional expertise? Yes No
26. Would you recommend this program to others? Yes No

 

Participant Information
27. Please note your profession and status (Check all that apply) □ Psychologist  □ Medical Professional  □ Masters Level Licensed Therapist □ Social Worker  □ Student
¬ Administrator  □ University Faculty  □ Other: □ list profession
28. Please note years in your profession □  Student  □  1-5  □  6-10  □  11-20   □  20+

 

Narrative

29. What was your overall impression of the activity?  What went well? What could have been improved?

 

 

30. What did you learn that was new or different?  How and/or will this information change how you practice?

 

 

31. What did you learn that was new or different?  How and/or will this information change how you practice?

 

 

32. What topics or presenters would you like to see at future CE presentations?

 

 

5. Other comments

 

 

Please use another sheet of paper if you wish to expand on your observations.

Note: Item numbering is included to facilitate CEC discussion and will require revision.